Critical Engagement: Socially-Engaged Research in the Baltimore Region
Leader: Lee Boot (Imaging Research Center)
This working group explored the potential of multi-modal digital publishing, participatory action research, and social practice in the arts and humanities to increase the positive impact of academic knowledge and research in communities local to UMBC.
Data Studies
Leaders: Jessica Pfeifer (Philosophy) and Susan Sterett (Public Policy)
This working group explored problems about the questions people ask, how they share information, and how the availability of online records draws more people into surveillance by both state and private actors.
Digital Humanities Research Group
Leaders: Haniyeh Barahouie (Modern Languages, Linguistics, and Intercultural Communication) and Landry Digeon (Language, Literacy, and Culture)
This working group explored the research focus of digital storytelling including discussions of digital literacies and competencies in the humanities and social sciences, narrative and storytelling research, and classroom work across disciplines.
Disability Studies
Leaders: Drew Holladay (English) and Sharon Tran (English)
The Disability Studies Faculty Group group focuses on reading interdisciplinary scholarship in disability studies (DS) and its application in higher education and other contexts. They read and discuss DS and DS-related theories of embodiment, epistemology, methodology, subaltern politics, and cultural analysis. Applications of DS include programs of inclusion, universal design, and accessibility in education and elsewhere (such as accessibility in technology and digital spaces). Group conversations can include how faculty can use DS scholarship in their classes and to redesign their own teaching practices.
Doing Digital Humanities
Leader: Anne Sarah Rubin (History/Imaging Research Center)
This working group was open to faculty interested in broadening their digital humanities practice, regardless of their skill level.
Leader: Mejdulene B. Shomali (Gender + Women’s Studies)
This group focused on discussing contemporary readings and authors whose work emphasizes intersectional topics and methods.
Mathematics and What it Means to be Human
Leader: Michele Osherow (English) and Manil Suri (Mathematics and Statistics)
“Mathematics and What it Means to be Human” was a faculty-designed project bringing together the departments of Theatre, Mathematics and Statistics, and English with the goal of creating a play script and performance. The project grew from a humanities course co-taught in Fall 2011 by Manil Suri, Mathematics and Statistics, and Michelle Osherow, English, which led to a conference presentation on ways in which scholars of various disciplines engage with mathematics.
Reading Sara Ahmed
Leader: Carole McCann (Gender + Women’s Studies)
This group discussed Sara Ahmed’s work in preparation for her campus visit in February 2019 for the Korenman Lecture and Humanities Forum Speaker Series.
Screen Studies
Leaders: Erin Hogan (Modern Languages, Linguistics, and Intercultural Communication) and Jules Rosskam (Visual Arts)
Screen studies brought film scholars, filmmakers, and enthusiasts from across campus together to promote screen studies and literacy of the moving image through discussions, scholarship sharing, and dynamic programming throughout and beyond UMBC.
Sound Studies
Leader: Earl Brooks(English)
Over the past decade, sound studies has been generating a buzz in disciplines across the humanities. Contributing to that conversation, the Sound Studies Faculty Working Group seeks to facilitate more cross-disciplinary discussions about sound and bring together faculty members with shared interests to encourage collaboration. The group discusses relevant sound studies issues from different disciplinary perspectives, has informal presentations of their own in-process work, and listens to invited talks from guest speakers.
Translation and Displacement
Leader: Piotr Gwiazda (English)
Kenneth Goldsmith calls translation “the ultimate humanist gesture”; he also dismisses it as mere “discourse” when contrasted with the artistic and political possibilities of “displacement” (the absence, impossibility or refusal of translation). This group worked to formulate a response – or counterargument – to Goldsmith.